System der
Lebewesen (Stefan Hintsche
2013)
Übersichtsbaum
Boreoeutheria > Laurasiatheria > Scrotifera
> Volitantia
> Chiroptera
> Pteropodiformes > Yinochiroptera > Rhinolophoidea > Rhinolophidae
Rhinolophidae |
|
|
|
Familia
Rhinolophidae Gray, 1825 (Familie Hufeisennasen):
-
93
Arten
Genus Rhinolophus
Lacépède, 1799 (Gattung Eigentliche Hufeisennasen):
-
93 Arten
Laurasiatheria > Scrotifera
> Volitantia
> Chiroptera
> Pteropodiformes > Yinochiroptera > Rhinolophoidea > Rhinolophidae > Rhinolophus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhinolophus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genus Rhinolophus
Lacépède, 1799 (Gattung Eigentliche Hufeisennasen):
-
93 Arten; der dargestellte Stammbaum orientiert sich
an den kombinierten Ergebnissen von Stoffberg
et al. (2010), Chattopadhyay et al. (2012), Taylor et al. (2012), Wu et al. (2012), Ith et al. (2011), Mao et al. (2010), Gu, He & Ao (2008),
Soisook et al. (2008), Chen et al. (2006), Yoshino et al. (2006), Yoshiyuki & Lim (2005), Fahr et al. (2002), Kitchener et al. (1995).
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus chiewkweeae Yoshiyuki & Lim, 2005 (Chiewkwee-Hufeisennase/Chiewkwee’s
Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus pearsonii Horsfield, 1851 (Pearson-Hufeisennase/Pearson’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus yunanensis Dobson, 1872 (Dobson-Hufeisennase/Dobson’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus hipposideros (Bechstein, 1800) (Kleine Hufeisennase/Lesser Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus mitratus Blyth, 1844 (Indische Hufeisennase/Mitred Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus beddomei Andersen, 1905 (Indische Wollige Hufeisennase/Indian Woolly Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus luctus Temminck, 1835 (Große Wollige Hufeisennase/Greater Woolly Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus sedulus K. Andersen, 1905 (Kleine Wollige Hufeisennase/Lesser Woolly Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus trifoliatus Temminck, 1834 (Dreiblatt-Hufeisennase/Trefoil Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus euryale Blasius, 1853 (Mittelmeer-Hufeisennase/Mediterranean Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus mehelyi Matschie, 1901 (Mehely-Hufeisennase/Mehely’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gefährdet
Rhinolophus alcyone Temminck, 1852 (Temminck-Hufeisennase/Halcyon Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus guineensis Eisentraut, 1960 (Guinea-Hufeisennase/Guinean Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gefährdet
Rhinolophus landeri Martin, 1838 (Lander-Hufeisennase/Lander’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus blasii Peters, 1866 (Blasius-Hufeisennase/Blasius’ Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus adami Aellen & Brosset, 1968 (Adam-Hufeisennase/Adam’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus maendeleo Kock, Csorba & Howelll, 1999 (Tansania-Hufeisennase/Maendeleo Horseshoe
Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus capensis Lichtenstein, 1823 (Kap-Hufeisennase/Cape Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus swinnyi Gough, 1908 (Swinny-Hufeisennase/Swinny’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus denti Thomas, 1904 (Dent-Hufeisennase/Dent’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus simulator K. Andersen, 1904 (Bushveld-Hufeisennase/Bushveld Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus xinanzhongguoensis Thomas, 1903 (Zhongguo-Hufeisennase/Zhongguo Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus bocharicus Kastschenko & Akimov, 1917 (Bokhara-Hufeisennase/Bokhara Horseshoe
Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schreber, 1774) (Große Hufeisennase/European Greater Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus nippon Temminck, 1835 (Große Japanische Hufeisennase/Japanese Greater Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus clivosus Cretzschmar, 1828 (Geoffroy-Hufeisennase/Geoffroy’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus deckenii Peters, 1867 (Decken-Hufeisennase/Decken’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus silvestris Aellen, 1959 (Wald-Hufeisennase/Forest Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus hillorum Koopman, 1989 (Hochland-Hufeisennase/Upland Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus sakejiensis Cotterill, 2002 (Sakeji-Hufeisennase/Sakeji Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus hilli Aellen, 1973 (Hill-Hufeisennase/Hill’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: vom Aussterben bedroht
Rhinolophus ruwenzorii Hill, 1942 (Ruwenzori-Hufeisennase/Ruwenzori Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gefährdet
Rhinolophus maclaudi Pousargues, 1897 (Maclaud-Hufeisennase/Maclaud’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: stark gefährdet
Rhinolophus ziama Vierhaus, Hutterer & Kock, 2002 (Ziama-Hufeisennase/Ziama Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: stark gefährdet
Rhinolophus eloquens K. Andersen, 1905 (Andersen-Hufeisennase/Eloquent Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus fumigatus Rüppell, 1842 (Rüppell-Hufeisennase/Rüppell’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus darlingi K. Andersen, 1905 (Darling-Hufeisennase/Darling’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus hildebrandtii Peters, 1878 (Hildebrandt-Hufeisennase/Hildebrandt’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus formosae Sanborn,
1939 (Taiwanesische Wollige Hufeisennase/Formosan Woolly Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus thomasi K. Andersen, 1905 (Thomas-Hufeisennase/Thomas’ Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus „indorouxii“ [Chattopadhyay, Garg, Kumar, Doss, Ramakrishnan
& Kandula, 2012] (Indische
Rote Hufeisennase/Indian Rufous Horseshoe Bat):
- Morphologische Beschreibung und Abgrenzung von Rhinolophus rouxii noch ausstehend, bisher nur anhand von Ruffrequenz zu unterscheiden
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus
rouxii Temminck, 1835 (Roux-Hufeisennase/Roux’s Rufous Horseshoe
Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus schnitzleri Wu & Thong, 2011 (Schnitzler-Hufeisennase/Schnitzler’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus sinicus K. Andersen, 1905 (Chinesische Hufeisennase/Chinese Rufous Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus paradoxolophus (Bourret, 1951) (Bourret-Hufeisennase/Bourret’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus rex G. M. Allen,
1923 (Guizhou-Hufeisennase/King Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus borneensis Peters, 1861 (Borneo-Hufeisennase/Bornean Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus robinsoni K. Andersen, 1918 (Robinson-Hufeisennase/Robinson’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus cognatus K. Andersen, 1906 (Andamanen-Hufeisennase/Andaman Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: stark gefährdet
Rhinolophus imaizumii Hill & Yoshiyuki, 1980 (Iriomote-Hufeisennase/Imaizumi’s
Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus perditus Andersen, 1918 (Ryukyu-Hufeisennase/Ryukyu Lesser Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus shortridgei Andersen, 1918 (Shortridge-Hufeisennase/Shortridge’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus convexus Csorba, 1997 (Pahang-Hufeisennase/Convex Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus subbadius Blyth, 1844 (Nepal-Hufeisennase/Little Nepalese Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus cornutus Temminck, 1835 (Kleine Japanische Hufeisennase/Japanese Lesser Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus pumilus K. Andersen, 1905 (Okinawa-Hufeisennase/Okinawan Lesser Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus monoceros K. Andersen,
1905 (Formosa-Hufeisennase/Formosan Lesser Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus pusillus Temminck, 1834 (Zwerg-Hufeisennase/Least Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus lepidus Blyth, 1844 (Blyth-Hufeisennase/Blyth’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus osgoodi Sanborn, 1939 (Osgood-Hufeisennase/Osgood’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus acuminatus Peters, 1871 (Spitze Hufeisennase/Acuminate Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus affinis Horsfield, 1823 (Java-Hufeisennase/Intermediate Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus stheno K. Andersen, 1905 (Südliche Braune Hufeisennase/Southern Brown Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus canuti Thomas & Wroughton, 1909 (Canut-Hufeisennase/Canut’s Horseshoe
Bat):
- Bestand: gefährdet
Rhinolophus coelophyllus Peters, 1867 (Peters-Hufeisennase/Croslet Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus creaghi Thomas, 1896 (Creagh-Hufeisennase/Creagh’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus euryotis Temminck, 1835 (Breitohr-Hufeisennase/Broad-eared Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus inops K. Andersen, 1905 (Mindanao Horseshoe/Mindanao Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus rufus Eydoux & Gervais, 1836 (Große Rote Hufeisennase/Large Rufous
Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: gering gefährdet (Vorwarnliste)
Rhinolophus shameli Tate, 1943 (Shamel-Hufeisennase/Shamel’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus subrufus K. Andersen, 1905 (Kleine Rote Hufeisennase/Small Rufous Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus anderseni Cabrera, 1909 (Palawan-Hufeisennase/Andersen’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Eventuell Unterart von Rhinolophus arcuatus
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus arcuatus Peters, 1871 (Indonesische Hufeisennase/Arcuate Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus celebensis K. Andersen, 1905 (Sulawesi-Hufeisennase/Sulawesi Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus madurensis K. Andersen, 1918 (Madura-Hufeisennase/Madura Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: stark gefährdet
Rhinolophus malayanus Bonhote, 1903 (Malaiische Hufeisennase/Malayan Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus nereis K. Andersen, 1905 (Anamba-Hufeisennase/Neriad Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus virgo K. Andersen,
1905 (Gelbgesichts-Hufeisennase/Yellow-faced Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus megaphyllus Gray, 1834 (Östliche Hufeisennase/Smaller Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus keyensis Peters, 1871 (Kai-Hufeisennase/Insular Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus simplex K. Andersen,
1905 (Lombok-Hufeisennase/Lombok Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus marshalli Thonglongya, 1973 (Marshall-Hufeisennase/Marshall’s Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus montanus Goodwin, 1979 (Timor-Hufeisennase/Timorese Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: Daten defizitär
Rhinolophus philippinensis Waterhouse, 1843 (Philippinen-Hufeisennase/Large-eared Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus huananus Wu, Motokawa & Harada, 2008 (Huanan-Hufeisennase/Huanan Horseshoe
Bat):
- Bestand: unbekannt (nicht bewertet)
Rhinolophus macrotis Blyth, 1844 (Großohr-Hufeisennase/Big-eared Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Rhinolophus siamensis Gyldenstolpe, 1917 (Siam-Hufeisennase/Thai Horseshoe Bat):
- Bestand: nicht gefährdet
Referenzen:
1)
Chattopadhyay,
B., Garg, K. M., Kumar, V., Doss, P. S., Ramakrishnan, U. & Kandula, S. (2012).
Sibling species in south
Indian populations of the rufous horse-shoe bat Rhinolophus rouxii. Conservation Genetics 13 (6): 1435-1445.
2)
Chen, S.-F., Rossiter, S. J., Faulkes, C. G. &
Jones, G. (2006).
Population genetic structure and demographic history of the endemic Formosan
lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus
monoceros). Molecular Ecology 15 (6): 1643-1656.
3) Churakov, G., Kriegs, J. O., Baertsch, R., Zemann, A., Brosius, J. & Schmitz, J. (2009). Mosaic retroposon insertion patterns in placental mammals. Genome Research 19: 868-875.
4)
Csorba, G. (1997). Description of a new species of Rhinolophus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Malaysia. Journal of Mammalogy 78 (2): 342-347.
5) Dietz, C, von Helversen, O. & Nill, D. (2007). Handbuch der Fledermäuse Europas und Nordwestafrikas. Franckh-Kosmos-Verlag GmbH, Stuttgart.
6)
Fahr, J.,
Vierhaus, H., Hutterer, R. & Kock, D. (2002). A revision of the Rhinolophus maclaudi species group with the description of a new
species from west Africa (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae). Myotis 40: 95-126.
7)
Gu, X.-M., He, S.-Y. & Ao, L. (2008). Molecular phylogenetics
among three families of bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae and Vespertilionidae)
based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes. Zoological Studies 47 (3): 368-378.
8)
Gunnell, G. F. & Simmons, N. B. (Hrsg.) (2012). Evolutionary
History of Bats – Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9)
Ith, S., Soisook, P., Bumrungsri, S., Kingston, T.,
Puechmaille, S. J., Struebig, M. J., Bu, S. S. H., Thong, V. D., Furey, N. M.,
Thomas, N. M. & Bates, P. J. J. (2011). A taxonomic review of Rhinolophus
coelophyllus Peters 1867 and R.
shameli Tate 1943 (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in continental southeast
Asia. Acta Chiropterologica 13 (1): 41-59.
10)
Jones, K.
E., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. & Gittleman, J. L. (2005). Bats, clocks, and rocks:
diversification patterns in Chiroptera. Evolution
59 (10): 2243-2255.
11)
Jones, K. E., Purvis, A., MacLarnon, A.,
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. & Simmons, N. B. (2002). A phylogenetic supertree of the bats
(Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological
Reviews 77 (2): 223-259.
12)
Kitchener, D. J., Schmitt, L. H., Strano, P., Wheeler,
A. & Suyanto, A. (1995).
Taxonomy of Rhinolophus simplex
Andersen, 1905 (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in Nusa Tenggara and Maluku,
Indonesia. Records of the Western
Australian Museum 17: 1-28.
13) Mao, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, S. & Rossiter, S. J. (2010). Historical male-mediated introgression in horseshoe bats revealed by multilocus DNA sequence data. Molecular Ecology 19 (7): 1352-1366.
14) Mickoleit, Gerhard (2004). Phylogenetische Systematik der Wirbeltiere. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München.
15)
Murphy, W. J., Pringle, T. H., Crider, T. A.,
Springer, M. S. & Miller, W. (2007). Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal
phylogeny. Genome Research 17: 413-421.
16)
Nowak, R. M. (1994). Walker’s Bats of the World. The
John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
17)
Prasad, A. B., Allard, M. W. & Green, E. D. (2008). Confirming the phylogeny of
mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25 (9): 1795-1808.
18)
Sazali, S. N., Hasan, N. H., Laman, C. J. &
Abdullah, M. T. (2008).
A morphometic analysis of Malaysian Rhinolophus
species. Malaysian Journal of
Mathematical Sciences 2 (1):
83-95.
19)
Sedlock, J. L. & Weyandt, S. E. (2009). Genetic divergence between
morphologically and acoustically cryptic bats: novel niche partitioning or
recent contact? Journal of Zoology 279 (4): 388-395.
20)
Simmons, N. B. (2005). An Eocene big bang for bats. Science 307 (5709): 527-528.
21)
Soisook, P., Bumrungsri, S., Satasook, C., Thong, V.
D., Bu, S. S. H., Harrison, D. L. & Bates, P. J. J. (2008). A taxonomic review of Rhinolophus stheno and R. malayanus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae)
from continental southeast Asia: an evaluation of echolocation call frequency
in discriminating between cryptic species. Acta
Chiropterologica 10 (2):
221-242.
22)
Soissok, P., Niyomwan, P., Srikrachang, M.,
Srithongchuay, T. & Bates, P. J. J. (2010). Discovery of Rhinolophus beddomei (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from Thailand with
a brief comparison to other related taxa. Tropical
Natural History 10 (1): 67-79.
23)
Stoffberg, S., Jacobs, D. S., Mackie, I. J. &
Matthee, C. A. (2010).
Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of Rhinolophus bats. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 54
(1): 1-9.
24)
Sun, K., Feng, J., Jin, L., Liu, Y., Shi, L. &
Jiang, T. (2009). Structure,
DNA sequence variation and phylogenetic implications of the mitochondrial
control region in horseshoe bats. Mammalian
Biology 74 (2): 130-144.
25)
Taylor, P. J., Stoffberg, S., Monadjem, A., Schoeman,
M. C., Bayliss, J. & Cotterill, F. P. D. (2012). Four new bat species (Rhinolophus hildebrandtii complex)
reflect Plio-Pleistocene divergence of dwarfs and giants across an afromontane
archipelago. PLoS ONE 7 (9): e41744. coi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041744: 1-23.
26)
Westheide,
W. & Rieger, R. (Hrsg.) (2010). Spezielle Zoologie Teil 2: Wirbel-
oder Schädeltiere – 2. Auflage. Spektrum
Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.
27)
Wu, Y., Harada, M. & Motokawa, M. (2009). Taxonomy of Rhinolophus yunanensis Dobson, 1872
(Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with a description of a new species from Thailand. Acta Chiropterologica 11 (2): 237-246.
28)
Wu, Y., Motokawa, M. & Harada, M. (2008). A new species of horseshoe
bat of the genus Rhinolophus from
China (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae). Zoological
Science 25 (4): 438-443.
29)
Wu, Y., Motokawa, M., Harada, M., Thong, V. D., Lin,
L.-K. & Li, Y.-C. (2012).
Morphometric variation in the pusillus
group of the genus Rhinolophus
(Mammalia: Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in East Asia. Zoological Science 29
(6): 396-402.
30)
Wu, Y. & Thong, D. (2011). A new species of Rhinolophus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from China. Zoological Science 28 (3): 235-241.
31)
Yoshino, H., Matsumura, S., Kinjo, K., Tamura, H.,
Ota, H. & Izawa, M. (2006).
Geographical variation in echolocation call and body size of the Okinawan least
horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus pumilus
(Mammalia: Rhinolophidae), on Okinawa-jima island, Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Zoological Science 23 (8): 661-667.
32)
Yoshiyuki, M. & Lim, B. L. (2005). A new horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus chiewkweeae (Chiroptera,
Rhinolophidae), from Malaysia. Bulletin
of the National Science Museum Serie A 31
(1): 29-36.